It only makes sense to revisit the proposal from the New High School (NOT EVEN) if we are able to critically analyze the areas that need to be explored in greater depth and improved in order to ensure the best education for Brazilian youth. 

Therefore, it is concerning that the focus of the discussion on technology in the NEM is limited to the percentage of class time that can be delivered through distance learning (EAD)—20% for regular high school programs and 30% for evening programs.

The essence of high school reform is the greater flexibility in curriculum content and educational pathways to meet young people’s demand for an education that is relevant to their personal, social, and professional lives, as well as society’s new demands.

The concept of making education more flexible should be extended to the learning process. Technology makes it possible to offer learning experiences in different formats, at different times, and in different locations, allowing young people to take a more active role in their own learning process. And this does not necessarily mean a reduction in social interaction and collaboration. Collaborative problem-solving projects and the exchange of experiences among students from different backgrounds and with varying levels of knowledge can be facilitated through technology.

The review of the proposal for the new high school system should focus on developing a new pedagogy in which technology facilitates both individual and collective learning processes. It should also ensure that schools have the minimum necessary access to internet connectivity and equipment that will allow teachers and students to integrate digital learning activities with individual and group interactions.

Learning through technology does not necessarily mean distance learning. Students in the same classroom—or in any other school setting—can engage in online educational activities either independently or with teacher guidance.

The question that should guide a meaningful discussion about the new high school system is whether the proposal truly incorporates a form of teaching and learning that is effective, efficient, and relevant to young people and society. To answer this question without considering the potential of technology is to deny the civilizational achievements of our time.

About the author:

*This text does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bett Brasil.

 Did you like this article? Then share it on your social media: